Square Yards Fraud Identification & Help Desk

A homebuyer who had invested in a residential project in Pune faced prolonged delays as the developer failed to deliver possession on time and showed no proper communication. After months of uncertainty, PropsAMC intervened and strategically pursued the matter. The legal pressure resulted in a favorable settlement, ensuring the buyer received a full refund of ₹56,00,000, which included the invested principal along with interest. This achievement highlights PropsAMC’s commitment to protecting homebuyers and securing justice.

In another case before the Delhi RERA Authority, a homebuyer who had invested ₹14,26,000 in a stalled project was left waiting indefinitely for possession. PropsAMC took decisive legal action under the provisions of the RERA Act, resulting in a refund order with 10.75% interest. The ruling brought long-awaited relief to the buyer, reaffirming PropsAMC’s dedication to ensuring accountability in the real estate sector.

A homebuyer who had paid ₹10,75,800 towards a residential unit faced delays and uncertainty as the project failed to progress. PropsAMC effectively represented the client before Delhi RERA, arguing for a refund under Section 18 of the RERA Act. The Authority ruled in favor of the buyer, directing a refund of the invested amount with 10.75% annual interest. This outcome demonstrates PropsAMC’s strong legal expertise in handling delayed possession cases.

A case involving an investment of ₹19,80,000 in a delayed residential project was taken up by PropsAMC before Delhi RERA. The project, launched years earlier, had seen no construction progress, leaving the buyer without possession. PropsAMC successfully argued the case, and the Authority directed the refund of the entire principal with 10.75% annual interest. This judgment highlights PropsAMC’s ability to secure effective remedies for distressed homebuyers.

Another group of homebuyers who had invested in a residential project in Dwarka, Delhi, were left helpless as the developer neither delivered possession nor refunded the amounts. Despite repeated follow-ups, the buyers’ concerns went unresolved. PropsAMC filed cases before the Delhi RERA Authority, resulting in orders for full refunds ranging from ₹5.37 lakh to ₹11.44 lakh, each with 10.75% interest. These victories ensured financial relief for multiple families and further established PropsAMC’s effectiveness in delivering justice.

In a case filed before MahaRERA, a Mumbai homebuyer who had invested under a subvention scheme faced unending delays as the developer failed to honor commitments. PropsAMC presented the matter before the Authority, securing an order for the refund of ₹12.10 lakh along with interest and compensation. This judgment not only brought relief to the buyer but also reinforced PropsAMC’s expertise in handling disputes across jurisdictions.

A Delhi homebuyer who invested ₹7.50 lakh in a project was left in limbo due to delays and unfulfilled promises from the developer. PropsAMC filed the case before Delhi RERA and secured a favorable order directing the refund of the entire principal along with 10.75% interest. The judgment underscores PropsAMC’s relentless efforts to ensure timely justice for buyers.

In another Delhi case, PropsAMC represented a homebuyer who invested in a cooperative housing society project but faced endless delays. The Authority ordered a refund of ₹7.50 lakh with 10.75% interest, granting the buyer long-awaited relief. This win once again highlighted PropsAMC’s efficiency in addressing real estate disputes.

A homebuyer in Bangalore who had invested ₹20.48 lakh in a residential project was unable to get possession due to the developer’s defaults. PropsAMC represented the buyer before the Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, which ruled in favor of the complainant and directed a refund with 7.5% annual interest. This case demonstrated PropsAMC’s ability to fight effectively for buyers even beyond RERA forums.

PropsLegal successfully represented homebuyers before Delhi RERA in a delayed project in Dwarka, ensuring the refund of ₹24.20 lakh. The amount was credited directly to the buyer’s bank account following the Authority’s order. This success stands as proof of PropsLegal’s ability to not only secure favorable orders but also ensure effective enforcement.

A homebuyer who invested ₹24,09,287 in a residential project launched in 2017 was promised possession by June 2019. However, the project saw continuous delays, leaving the buyer without a home. PropsLegal stepped in and filed a complaint before Karnataka RERA under Section 18 of the RERA Act. On 29th May 2025, the Authority ruled in favor of the buyer, ordering a refund of ₹38,98,415 along with ₹25,000 towards legal costs and additional interest until final payment. This judgment not only secured financial relief but also highlighted PropsLegal’s strong representation in delayed possession cases.

Another homebuyer who had paid ₹21,14,143 in the same residential project faced similar challenges as possession was never delivered. PropsLegal filed the case before Karnataka RERA and successfully argued the buyer’s right to a refund under the Act. On 29th May 2025, the Authority directed the promoter to refund ₹34,34,484, including additional interest until the final payment. This outcome reinforced PropsLegal’s expertise in protecting buyers from unfair practices in stalled projects.

In yet another case from the same project, a homebuyer who had invested ₹24,75,007 was left stranded as the developer failed to deliver possession on the promised date. PropsLegal represented the complainant before Karnataka RERA, where the Authority recognized the buyer’s hardships and ruled in their favor. On 29th May 2025, the Authority ordered a refund of ₹40,62,474 along with ₹50,000 in legal costs and additional interest until the final settlement. This victory demonstrated PropsLegal’s persistence in securing justice for homebuyers.

A homebuyer who had invested ₹27,18,985 in the same delayed residential project sought relief through PropsLegal’s legal assistance. With timely legal action and effective representation, the case was presented before Karnataka RERA under Section 18 of the Act. On 29th May 2025, the Authority ordered the promoter to refund ₹41,58,906 along with ₹50,000 towards legal costs and applicable interest until full repayment. This success emphasized PropsLegal’s ability to handle complex disputes where large sums are at stake.

In another complaint from the same project, a homebuyer who invested ₹24,81,359 had been waiting for possession since 2019 without any progress from the developer. PropsLegal filed the case before Karnataka RERA and argued for a full refund under the buyer’s statutory rights. On 29th May 2025, the Authority ruled in favor of the homebuyer, directing the promoter to refund ₹40,65,434 along with ₹50,000 in legal costs and additional interest until final payment. This result reinforced PropsLegal’s dedication to protecting homebuyers’ rights in delayed projects.