The Bombay High Court has expressed its displeasure over the short notice given by the Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) to the original slum dwellers in Worli, Mumbai. These residents, who were promised permanent alternate accommodation, were given just seven days to vacate their homes. The court criticized the SRA for this abrupt decision after nearly two decades of their residence and emphasized the need for considering the well-being of the slum dwellers.
Apex Grievance Redressal Committee to Decide on Stay Order
In response to the eviction notice, the High Court directed the Apex Grievance Redressal Committee (AGRC) to convene a meeting and decide on the issue of a stay order. The court made it clear that the AGRC should not prioritize the interests of the builders but rather focus on the welfare of the slum dwellers. The AGRC is expected to release its order by Thursday morning, until then the HC has put a hold on the eviction notice since it believes that just seven days is insufficient for families to relocate.
Court Urges Authorities to be Mindful of Human Impact
The court criticized the SRA for treating slum dwellers as mere pawns in a chess game. It emphasized that these are human beings with families and their concerns should not be disregarded. The court also expressed its discontent with the AGRC for being unavailable during such crucial matters and warned that it would take action against them if their orders are not complied with in the future. The HC urged the AGRC to be more responsive and available to resolve emergency situations promptly.
Background of the Case
According to the court, the slum dwellers residing at Khan Abdul Gaffar Road in Worli were initially informed that their premises were Permanent Alternate Accommodation. However, abruptly on the developer’s application, the Letter of Intent (LoI) was amended. The two occupied buildings were then treated as a transit camp and ordered to be demolished for project completion. This sudden change of status created anxiety and uncertainty among the slum dwellers, who were also required to pay a transit rent.
Humanity Should Come First
The High Court expressed concern over the apparent pressure tactics used by the developer. It criticized the argument that several other slum dwellers had already accepted the transit rent and vacated. The court reiterated that such actions should not define how human beings are treated. It stressed the importance of compassion and humane consideration in dealing with these matters.
Looking Ahead
While the AGRC will be making its decision with regards to the stay order, the Bombay High Court has sent a clear message to the SRA and other authorities that eviction notices should not be issued with such short timelines. The court’s strong criticism underscores the need to prioritize the welfare of the slum dwellers and treat them with dignity and respect. It remains to be seen how the AGRC will address the concerns raised by the court and ensure a fair resolution for the affected residents.
